The Human Mind and the Outer Limits
I have always been fascinated by the parts of our Midrashic (religious
folklore) tradition that we choose to invest in, and by the parts that we
choose to ignore. By that I mean that we possess an enormous body of Aggadic
and mystical literature of vast scope and diversity - far larger in that
sense than our Halachik (legal) material - that often includes contradictory
or mutually exclusive elements. Yet through some process of national
filtering some parts of that material - opposed though they may be within
the literature itself - become part of Jewish popular culture, but others do
not, though they appear to be equally profound. This investment on the part
of the community appears to be so significant that it can effect the way in
which we go about practicing our religion.
An example of this process can be found in the non-recitation of "Tahanun" -
the penitential prayer - on the ninth of Av. Normally this prayer is omitted
on joyous days because of the serious confessional nature of its theme. It
would, therefore, seem to be a "natural" for inclusion in the liturgy on that
day, when we commemorate our worst and most terrible historic tragedies.
Included in this commemoration are the destruction of both the First and
Second Temples, the loss of the first and second Jewish Commonwealths, the
Spanish Expulsion in 1492, and - at least in some synagogues - the Holocaust.
For those who believe that God's Providence plays an active role in shaping
the course of History, sin must certainly have contributed to His decision to
visit such tragedies on our people. Even for those who do not so believe,
the events of the 9th of Av still make it an appropriate time for
introspection and "Teshuva" (repentance). "Tahanun" is a natural vehicle for
such sentiments. Yet it is not included in the liturgy on this most tragic
of days.
Traditionally the explanation for this anomaly is that the Messiah will,
when he arrives, be born on this date. The day, therefore, carries a latent
festive as a contemporary event, and, in fact, so the claim goes, will
eventually be transformed into an actual holiday once the Messiah is born and
completes his mission, thus precluding the "Tahanun" recitation. This bit of
Midrash is by no means normative even within traditional literature. We
await the Messiah, "Bechol Yom Sheyavoh" on any day that he chooses to come.
When he comes he will not need to pass a "birthday" test as a necessary
condition of his being deemed credible. Further, there are many sources that
tell of the Messiah being born at creation (which traditionally is believed
to have occurred on and around Rosh Hashanah), and only awaiting the right
moment to reveal himself. Finally even the source of our Midrashic ninth of
Av, "holiday" is itself suspect. It states that on the day of the
destruction of the Temple, the Messiah was born. In context it appears to
refer to the Ninth of Av 70 C.E. and not to every annual repetition of the
date. Therefore, it was probably, originally meant as a powerfully defiant
claim that redemption and salvation were already present at the moment of
destruction, that we as a people will ultimately be triumphant, and that we
will not accept defeat. Important though this is, no intent to make a
holiday out of this tragic day is evident in the source or its original
context.
Despite the evidence of the literature itself, the Ninth of Av remains the
future birthdate of the Messiah in our popular culture, and our investment in
that claim has created and maintains the liturgical anomaly of non-recitation
of "Tahanun", thus creating a festive moment, on the most tragic day of our
Jewish year. What this creates ultimately, is an even more powerful
statement of transcendence, of courage and refusal to capitulate to tragedy.
The emergence of the indominable spirit of the Jew - of the human being in
the finest and fullest sense of the term - appears in those few festive
moments as we collectively make the statement that we will not wallow in
tragedy, we will not be defeated by it, we will not accept the imposed
limitations and definitions of this day that is otherwise seen as a time of
complete and unyielding tragedy. We will push the limits, redefine the
boundaries, and bring, at least an intimation of triumph and joy into the
day.
It is remarkable how often, and in how many different dimensions of human
experience, Jewish law and practice reflects this fundamental and distinctive
human need and desire to reach beyond what "is", toward something larger and
better. A powerful example is our usage of time. Our holidays are defined
as 24 or 25 hour of time. If the day in question is a multi-day holiday,
then seven or eight or nine such periods demarcate it. Yet all of our
holidays carry a sort of penumbra effect in which the times that surround
them, both before and after the holiday, are altered by the presence of the
holiday. There is a three week build-up of increasingly stringent mourning
practices leading to the Ninth of Av. The month before Rosh Hashanah is a
time of daily shofar blowing, penitential prayers, and special alterations of
the liturgy. We ritually count fifty days to get to Shavous from Passover.
Leave your home before Purim with plans that will keep you away until after
Passover, and you need not remove leaven from your home. Leave after Purim,
i.e. within 30 days of Passover, even if you will not return for months, and
you must conduct the Search for Leaven the night before you leave.
The penumbra effect continues after the holiday as well. One does not eat
meat, nor shave, nor take a haircut until noon of the 10th of Av as some
aspects of the mourning period continue. So too, eulogies for the deceased
are not offered on the day after a festival, because joy, too, strains and
alters the boundaries that attempt to contain and constrain it.
Personal space, a modern psychological construct with ancient Jewish
parallels, displays these same "boundary - bending" propensities in its
treatment within Jewish law. The legal principle of "Daled Amot" (4 cubits)
operates in, for example, the case of a lost object, lacking a unique
identifying mark that becomes the property of the finder. Should such an
object lie within 4 cubits (approximately six feet) of me it belongs to me.
Even if someone else were to cross the room and quickly snatch it from the
ground before I could pick it up, my claim would be superior, as it is
located in my personal space. My teacher, Rabbi Moses Tendler of Yeshiva
University commented on this principle by saying, "Jewish law has made the 4
cubits around the person equivalent to his living room. One would not run
through someone's living room to get where he was going if he was in hurry.
Then why do we run through people's personal space in this way?" In fact,
the limits of my physical body are clearly defined in spacial terms.
However, my personal space extends beyond those limits, thus breaking the
bonds of the strict and limiting real world definition, and again expressing
that defining human need for transcendence.
Human beings in the aggregate also display this same propensity, as
expressed through Jewish legal treatment. Early biblical history is written
against the transformation of the Jewish nation from a nomadic people to a
more settled and civilized community of city dwellers. Each city that was
built and settled in the promised land was an outpost of civilization and a
victorious banner raised high in the battle against the desert and other
elements that would defeat this process if allowed to do so. But Jewish law
was not satisfied with limiting a city to its boundaries. Beyond the city
walls an area of as much as 2,000 cubits was to be used to extend the city's
identity into the unsettled area beyond. Among the purposes of these
extended domains was the demarcation of an area left uncultivated in which
the city dweller could enjoy the amenities of cool breezes and a pastoral
setting. This "Migrash" as it is called in Jewish law, was required for all
cities under Jewish control. In this way civilization in its best and most
environmentally conscious form, was also not limited to its immediate
boundaries, but pushed beyond them. So, too, the symbolic message was thus
expressed that more was left to accomplish and that the challenge of
civilizing the world would be met.
The totality that emerges from this multi-dimensional reappearance of the
"expansion beyond the limits theme" in time, space, society and celebration
truly touches on something fundamental to the essential human being. In one
of the Star Trek movies Dr. McCoy offers a brief tribute to his remarkably
successful Captain Kirk and attributes that success to Kirk's unique capacity
to expand the possibilities, to reach beyond the limits of the particular
situation, to find an additional unthought of way to beat the odds. Frankly,
any human being who does not possess at least some intimation, some hint that
there is more that is possible than what is present in the here and now has
lost a great deal of what makes us special. As the old song says. "Is that
all there is? If that's all there is, then let's keep dancing". The ennui
and despair in the song and in such a life situation is excrutiatingly
painful precisely because we sense that it marks the loss of the core of
spirituality and meaning that all human beings need, in order to simply keep
going, if not to achieve an appropriate quality of life.
Many of society's critics and analysts have commented that ours is the first
generation that does not operate on the assumption that things will be better
for our children than they have been for ourselves. In fact, most of us
believe and fear that the opposite will be true. Is it any wonder that
ennui, depression and a sense of despair are such a distressingly regular
part of our society - to our great loss?
One snapshot of this loss: A recent television news story interviewed
teenagers on their way out of the Smithsonian's Air and Space Museum in
Washington. Listening to youngster after youngster talk about costs and
domestic problems to be solved as the totality of his or her response to the
prospect of continued space exploration at this juncture in our history was
extremely troubling to me. One can certainly debate the merits and size of
the space program. But if even teenagers don't express some excitement and
exhilaration in contemplating pushing the limits and reaching for the stars,
we have certainly lost something very precious.
We return finally to the 9th of Av, this day that by history, liturgy, and
ritual is a day of ultimate, unending, unyielding, unbearable darkness and
tragedy. With all the extensive Midrashic material that discusses the day
and its sad history, there is one lone source that may suggest, if you don't
read too carefully, that one year, some year, maybe this year, a baby might
be born on the 9th of Av who will bring the ultimate transcendence of all our
limitations and fundamentally transform the reality in which we live from the
harshness that we know to the ultimate good that we pray for. From this we
created a moment of Yom Tov, of holiday celebration in the midst of despair.
To not do so would be to stop being human.
|